Stirring it up (Part 2)
Thinking polymers and bioconsistency again, vis-a-vis plastic kayaks. I don’t know the extent to which the construction of wood and composite boats contributes to pollution; I’m sure there are environmental consequences of using polyester resins and gelcoat, for example. But even if this is so, even if the short-term effects on the ecosystem are adverse in either case, it seems to me that plastic kayaks are still more of a long-term liability for the planet.
There is an island of plastic out in the Pacific, larger than Texas, made entirely of floating plastic debris. Fishing floats, chunks of buckets and squeeze-bottles, disposable packaging and anonymous flotsam, twisting in the slowly moving ocean currents, carried steadily around the circle. It wouldn’t surprise me if there weren’t a few roto-molded polyethylene kayaks in there as well.
I have to think that the ongoing, long-lived negative implications of plastic kayak construction outweigh any benefits incurred in terms of pricing and durability. A composite boat, well cared for and maintained, should last a lifetime, which, let’s face it, is all the durability anyone needs. At some point, however, the fibers will become brittle, the resin will fade and crack, and that same composite kayak will begin to separate into its various elements. It may take a long time, but it will, one day, be gone.
The plastic continent in the North Pacific Gyre, on the other hand, will always be there. From here on out.